Site icon Peace x Piece Wellness

Testing Inflammatory Markers Helps Predict Health Risks

Functional medicine practitioners often use functional lab tests to uncover markers of inflammation. These markers are used to assess the level of chronic inflammation in a patient – something that is not as commonly used in traditional medical testing for the prevention of chronic disease. It is important to use inflammatory markers to help predict the risk of health issues leading to chronic disease so that appropriate diet and lifestyle interventions can be recommended.

The most common markers of inflammation in blood tests are C-reactive protein (CRP), which measures the amount of proteins in the blood; white blood cell count, which is an indication of infection or immune system activity; and fibrinogen, which helps your body form blood clots. Other inflammatory markers include homocysteine, interleukins, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum amyloid A (SAA), and uric acid levels as well as calprotectin.

Inflammatory markers provide insight into the health of a patient, as they can indicate underlying inflammation. An elevated CRP level, for example, can point to systemic inflammation or an infection. Elevated white blood cell count can indicate bacterial infections or autoimmune disorders. High fibrinogen levels can point to thrombotic events like stroke and heart attack.

What are some chronic health issues that commonly elevate inflammatory markers?

By measuring markers of inflammation, functional medicine practitioners are able to uncover deeper insight into the individual’s health status to then create targeted treatment plans that address the root cause of the health issues and not just the symptoms. While these markers are sometimes used by traditional providers, they are more commonly used for the prevention of disease in functional, whole-body medicine approaches.

While this is not a comprehensive review of inflammatory markers, by understanding more about these markers of inflammation and how functional medicine practitioners use them, individuals may be better positioned to take control of their own health and seek the treatments that best suit them.

References:

1.          Shrivastava AK, Singh HV, Raizada A, et al. Inflammatory markers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2015;43(1):81-87. doi:10.1016/j.aller.2013.11.003

2.          Khanna D, Khanna S, Khanna P, Kahar P, Patel BM. Obesity: A Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation and Its Markers. Cureus. Published online February 28, 2022. doi:10.7759/cureus.22711

3.          Maamar M, Artime A, Pariente E, et al. Post-COVID-19 syndrome, low-grade inflammation and inflammatory markers: a cross-sectional study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2022;38(6). doi:10.1080/03007995.2022.2042991

4.          Vinhaes CL, Cruz LAB, Menezes RC, et al. Chronic hepatitis B infection is associated with increased molecular degree of inflammatory perturbation in peripheral blood. Viruses. 2020;12(8). doi:10.3390/v12080864

5.          Fevang B, Wyller VBB, Mollnes TE, et al. Lasting Immunological Imprint of Primary Epstein-Barr Virus Infection With Associations to Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation and Fatigue. Front Immunol. 2021;12. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.715102

6.          Oudi M El, Aouni Z, Mazigh C, et al. Homocysteine and markers of inflammation in acute coronary syndrome. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2010;15(2).

7.          Mucci F, Marazziti D, Vecchia A Della, et al. State-of-the-art: Inflammatory and metabolic markers in mood disorders. Life. 2020;10(6). doi:10.3390/life10060082

8.          Nielsen FH. Magnesium deficiency and increased inflammation: Current perspectives. J Inflamm Res. 2018;11. doi:10.2147/JIR.S136742

Exit mobile version